The Free Soil Party - 1093 Words

30. In 1848, the Free Soil party platform advocated all of the following except [A] free government homesteads for settlers. [B] internal improvements. [C] an end to slavery in the District of Columbia. [D] support of the Wilmot Proviso. [E] opposition to slavery in the territories. 31. According to the principle of â€Å"popular sovereignty,† the question of slavery in the territories would be determined by [A] the most popular national leaders. [B] a Supreme Court decision. [C] congressional legislation. [D] the vote of the people in any given territory. [E] a national referendum. 32. The key issue for the major parties in the 1848 presidential election was [A] expansion. [B] personalities. [C] Indian removal. [D] slavery.†¦show more content†¦[B] the fact that, despite divisions over slavery, the House of Representatives would unite to expel a member for bad conduct. [C] the seriousness of political divisions in the North. [D] the fact that passions over slavery were becoming dangerously inflamed in both North and South. [E] the importance of honor to northerners. 45. Match each candidate in the 1856 election below with the correct party. ___ A. John C. Frà ©mont ___ B. Millard Fillmore ___ C. Martin Van Buren ___ D. James Buchanan 1. Democratic 2. Republican 3. Know-Nothing [A] A-2, B-3, D-1 [B] A-3, C-1, D-2 [C] A-1, B-3, C-2 [D] B-1, C-2, D-3 [E] A-2, B-3, C-1 46. In ruling on the Dred Scott case, the United States Supreme Court [A] held that slaveowners could not take slaves into free territories. [B] expected to lay to rest the issue of slavery in the territories. [C] hoped to stimulate further debate on the slavery issue. [D] supported the concept of popular sovereignty. [E] reunited the Democratic party. 47. The political career of Abraham Lincoln could best be described as [A] marred by early political opportunism. [B] hurt by the Kansas-Nebraska Act. [C] hurt by his marriage. [D] characterized by a rapid rise to power. [E] slow to get off the ground. 48. As a result of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, [A] Lincoln’s national stature was diminished. [B] Lincoln was elected to the Senate. [C] Douglas defeated Lincoln for the Senate. [D]Show MoreRelatedThe Confederate and Union War1127 Words   |  5 Pagescountry than what the chief commander actually and initially issued the enlistment for. Chapter 13: Analyze the arguments of the Free Soil Party. How did its members understand freedom? How did slavery fit into their platform? The term â€Å"Free Soil† seemed to be very controversial during that time era because of it’s demand and stipulations. Actually, the Free Soil position seemed to be very popular with much appeal in the North, and was seen fairly different from the idea of abolishment. ItRead MoreNorth South Tensions Before Civil War868 Words   |  4 Pagesthreatened free-labor ideology (359). As a result, in 1846, Pennsylvania Democrat David Wilmot proposed an amendment, known as the Wilmot Proviso. Wilmot proposed that slavery be barred in the territories gained from Mexico (359. A handful of state legislatures endorsed the Wilmot proviso. However, the Wilmot’s proposal most important in that it stirred up Northern hatred of slavery. With anti-slavery sentiment gaining momentum,in 1848, antislavery whigs and former supporters of the Liberty Party joinedRead MoreThe Bill Of 1846 : The Greatest Achievement Of Totalitarian Rule1452 Words   |  6 Pagesmillions of dollars for negotiating,is the encompassment of the U.S urge for bureaucratic and calm compromise lacking the call of war, the Wilmot Proviso had no place in the bill of 1846. The Proviso stated that any territory from Mexico should be a free state, and should have slavery banned. Unfortunately it was not passed because it was blatantly anti-South and southern senators were fearful of their plantations and slaves. The Missouri Compromise quelled government panic with the slave issue, butRead MoreThe Kansas- Nebraska Act Essay1085 Words   |  5 Pagesnon-Democratic Northern party factions to join together and oppose the Democratic power in American politics. The non-democratic parties that join forces were the Free-soilers, Anti- Nebraska Whigs, Anti- Nebraska Democrats, Nativist groups and Abolitionists. These groups created the Republican Party. The Republican Party unlike parties before it was a purely sectional party. The Republican Party made its first real stand during the election of 1856. During this election the Republican Party came close toRead MoreA Brief Biography of Sam Houston701 Words   |  3 Pagesissue of western expansion was an important topic in the middle of the 19th century, and with the admittance of new territories, there was the controversy on whether or not new western territories should be admitted to the Union as slave states or free states. Sam Houston was supportive of western expansion, but he was not supportive of the spreading of slavery. Houston’s opposition came to Congress in the form of a bill in 1854. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was proposed, and it repealed the MissouriRead MoreThe Reform Mo vements Of The United States Of America Essay1195 Words   |  5 Pagesvalues of the new, rising nation and its belief that all men are equal. Advocates for the anti-slavery movement were not united from the start; some supported gradual emancipation of slaves, others were for immediate and radical abolishment, while free-soil activists argued for restriction of slavery to certain areas in order to prevent its spread across the country. Radical abolition movement was part of the reform movements related to religious revivals in an effort to create a righteous societyRead MoreThe Wilmot Proviso And The Civil War1614 Words   |  7 Pageswere to be acquired from Mexico, there should be no slavery or involuntary servitude there. His Proviso sparked new political conflict and debate over the extension of slavery and tested the Missouri Compromise that had protected both slave states and free states and not permitting it in newly admitted states. With newly acquired territory from th e Mexican War, the national debate continued and in 1846, the House of Representatives passed the Wilmot Proviso but it did not pass through the Senate. PresidentRead MoreThe Slavery Of The South Essay810 Words   |  4 Pagesabolition of slavery. The people behind this movement were called abolitionists. One of the leading abolitionists was William Lloyd Garrison. He began publishing a newspaper against slavery. His paper was called The Liberator because he wanted to free the slaves. In 1852, Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, appeared.The book emphasized the worst evils of slavery. Nat Turner, a black preacher, led a group of Virginia slaves in a revolt against their masters. The rebelling slavesRead MoreThe Decline of the Democrats1567 Words   |  6 PagesThe Decline of the Democrats--The Decline of the South The history of political parties in the United States has always hinged upon the key sectarian differences of the times in which such parties were existent. The very foundation of political parties in this country, which began with the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, is demonstrative of this fact as those two groups were largely split on the issue of national versus states rights and the implementation of a national bank. As the countryRead MoreThe Battle Against Yankee Invaders1734 Words   |  7 Pageswas an equal number of free and slave states, which added up to thirty states. The new territory acquired from Mexico threatened to disrupt this balance. An ideology termed free soil argued to congress that slavery ought to be not included in the new territories. This extreme doctrine of free soil threatened to banish the rights of free Americans across the country. The moderates endorsed popular sovereignty, which would allow each new territory to choose between free soil and slavery through their

South Suburban Physiology Online Class Title Page

South Suburban Physiology online class title page : Why do you procrastinator so much ! Martell C Williams South Suburban Community College Abstract The problem is that I procrast when it come with school and work.In the past year I didnt do well in this same class end of having to drop the class in the main reason why is because I would wait last minture to do the work or go online. It cause me to be late and I tuned in the assessment last minute. I wait last minute to do everything. My hypotheses is if you follow these easy step you wouldn t procurator anymore.The methods and steps I use to help me with my stop procrastination is write down my work on a calendar. Break my work into little steps. Then change the area i m in if it s loud ,and I cannot stay focus ; I would go somewhere quiet , so I can get the work done . Most of the time it s the library for me because it s so quiet in the library. Create a goal a timeline with deadlines about the work. Eliminate my procrastination pit-stops which mean to us young adults election deceive anything that stop me from doing my work is a pit-stop. Get a friend that inspire to who is going to take action and help you not procurator which its my girlfriend. Ask for help if you stuck on something don t wait last minute ask your teacher or friend. Write your goals on something look at it everyday. If you want to get this work done write it down look at it everyday until it is finish. Finally Just do it don t waitShow MoreRelatedEssay on Silent Spring - Rachel Carson30092 Words   |  121 PagesSilent Spring Rachel Carson Online Information For the online version of BookRags Silent Spring Premium Study Guide, including complete copyright information, please visit: http://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-silentspring/ Copyright Information  ©2000-2007 BookRags, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The following sections of this BookRags Premium Study Guide is offprint from Gales For Students Series: Presenting Analysis, Context, and Criticism on Commonly Studied Works: Introduction, Author BiographyRead More_x000C_Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis355457 Words   |  1422 PagesIntroduction to Statistics and Data Analysis This page intentionally left blank Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis Third Edition Roxy Peck California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Chris Olsen George Washington High School, Cedar Rapids, IA Jay Devore California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Australia †¢ Brazil †¢ Canada †¢ Mexico †¢ Singapore †¢ Spain †¢ United Kingdom †¢ United States Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis, ThirdRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesOrganizational Behavior This page intentionally left blank Organizational Behavior EDITION 15 Stephen P. Robbins —San Diego State University Timothy A. Judge —University of Notre Dame i3iEi35Bj! Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montreal Toronto Delhi Mexico City Sao Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Taipei Tokyo Editorial Director: Sally Yagan Director of Editorial Services:Read MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesmymanagementlab is an online assessment and preparation solution for courses in Principles of Management, Human Resources, Strategy, and Organizational Behavior that helps you actively study and prepare material for class. Chapter-by-chapter activities, including built-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to review in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY

Dystopian Literature free essay sample

Literature is not concerned with shaping the future but with teaching us about the problems of the present†. Discuss Lord of the Flies and Animal Farm in light of this comment. Many critics have argued that several extreme historical circumstances of the 20th century have led to the flourishing of dystopian literature. Dystopias usually extrapolate elements of contemporary society and function as a warning against some modern trend, often the threat of oppressive regimes in one form or another. In Orwells Animal Farm and Golding’s Lord of the Flies, both authors create a dystopia; however the intention of the characters originally was to create a perfect society. But Golding and Orwell are trying to convey that society will always be corrupt and a utopia can never be achieved, as in both novels the uncorrupted leaders who begin with good intentions soon spiral out of control with their want of power and control. In Animal Farm, this process happens gradually with the changing of the seven commandments by Napoleon to justify his own behaviour which at the beginning of the revolution he outlined as enemy traits. For example, the sixth commandment is No animal shall kill any other animal but Squealer changes this to No animal shall kill any other animal without cause’. After Napoleon executes animals that were allegedly plotting against him, also when Boxer is injured Napoleon sells him to a glue factory to be slaughtered. In response to the question both novels can seen as using allergory to criticise society in the time they were written. Though Lord of the flies is fictional its exploration of violence and brutality can be seen as partly based on Goldings experience of World War II. In relation to Animal Farm the novel reflects events leading up to and during the Stalin era before World War II. There are several metaphors in â€Å"Animal Farm† which refer to the Russian Revolution and demonstrate how a dream of freedom can soon turn into a violent nightmare which provides an indirect analysis of the perpetrators and events of the Russian Revolution. Animalism can be seen as an allegory mirror of the Soviet Union and is the ideology which brainwashes the animals into their new government. At first it is a positive change from â€Å"Manor Farm† which gives them connotations of slaves as they are owned by humans into â€Å"Animal Farm† however, the majority of animals lead a worse existence under the rule of pigs who promised equality. There are comparisons that can be made with animalism and Marxism, the first is the economy, both have firm beliefs that there is no need for money or social class, however this fundamental principle is immediately undermined by the fact that the pigs are in charge thus creating a hierarchy in the farm in which they are the top of. Another similarity is that the two concepts were created by respectable â€Å"men†, Old Major; a pig who dreams of animalism instigates the revolution in the farm before his death. Karl Marx was the soul thinker of Marxism and Orwell demonstrates through the plot in the novel how ideas of Marxism and communism bring about equality immediately but corruption in leadership brings about oppression. This technique of using animals to represent the society Orwell wished to criticise can be seen in all the characters in â€Å"Animal Farm†, however we will explore only the main contributors. Napoleon is the villain of the novel and an obvious metaphor for Joseph Stalin, the very name Napoleon is fitting as the Napoleon the French dictator was seen by many as the Anti-Christ. At first Napoleon seems like a good leader but eventually is overcome by greed which is what occurred in Stalin’s rein, he soon became power hungry and lived a life of luxury while Russia and its people suffered. Another part of Stalin that Orwell illustrates through Napoleon is the paranoia of losing power and this fear breeds violence and leads to the execution of innocents who were seen as a threat. Another important character is Squealer which many critics correlate with the Russian media’s use of propaganda. He is the spokesperson for the pigs and has to make everything oppressive and exploiting which occurs on the farm positive making lying necessary, much like what the media’s job was in the rein of Stalin. Snowball is also significant in representing Trotsky who was original revolutionaries but as Stalin rose to power became one of his biggest enemies and was finally expelled one year after Stalin took power. Snowball is exiled from the farm the same as Trotsky but Trotsky was also exiled from Russian history, his face was removed from pictures of the revolution and he was renounced as a traitor, finally he was assassinated by a Stalinist agent in 1940. Although Moses the Raven has a minor role in the novel it is a significant one, as he represents the Russian Orthodox Church. Moses fled the farm shortly after the revolution and when he eventually returned he never did any work but preached to the animals about Sugar Candy Mountain, a paradise he claimed animals go to go after they die. It is important that at first Moses is not allowed on the farm but then welcomed by Napoleon and given a â€Å"ration of beer†. Orwell could be highlighting that the Russian Church was used as a tool of oppression, as according to Marx religion is â€Å"the opium of the people†, it numbs people of their exploitation and suffering much like a drug. It also demonstrates that even the most good and pure people on earth can be corrupted and Orwell could be indicating that this cycle of corruption will always continue as human nature will never change. Further metaphors that are used as a parallel to the Russian revolution such as the song â€Å"Beasts of England† is a metaphor for the ideology of communism. The project of building the windmill represents Stalin’s â€Å"Five year plan† in which he promised would improve the Soviets Industry which would lead to shorter working weeks for the working class as the animals were promised an easier life. However, both were a failure but Napoleon and Stalin refuse to admit to defeat and continue thinking that they will solve the problems. Another significant technique used by Orwell is the portrayal of the oppressed through the omniscient third person narrator which makes the story more universal and relevant not only within the context of the novel. It challenges the assumption that oppression is born out of evil motives and dictatorship but that it is self inflicted by the acceptance of and the naivety of the oppressed. The main technique that is used to justify the oppression of the animals is through the manipulation of language which is exploited by the intelligent pigs. They twist the words of the Old Majors ideals on socialism and change their own original seven commandments to decriminalize their own actions. Another means of control is the songs used to create a collective conscience on the farm mainly the â€Å"Beasts of England† which is propaganda technique which brainwashes the animals to believe that the government has their best interests at heart. Thus although some will argue that Orwell’s intention was to provide a cautionary tale through the moral issues of human kind highlighted in his novel it is important to consider it was a recollection of current affairs, criticising the original readers. So before messages of warning can be translated for future societies through the criticism in this novel the problems of current occurrences need to be tackled by the oppressed and the oppressors because there is one common trait they both hold, human nature which they can never escape. â€Å"Lord of the Flies† shares similar themes to â€Å"Animal farm† as it is deeply rooted in socio-political concerns of its era as it was written in post World War II. It could be seen that the novel is highlighting the Cold War conflict between Liberal Democracy and totalitarian communism. Ralph can be seen to represent the liberal tradition and Jack the military type dictatorship of the communist regime. It is significant that Golding sets the novel in future reality after an atomic war however this does not necessarily mean he is fixated on the future of society but making this tale relevant to future readers who will question the corruption of their present society. Golding uses heavy symbolism to illustrate the parallels that the boys â€Å"new† society is not much different than the one they belonged to in civilization. Before the boys arrive the Island can be seen like the Garden of Eden however this is soon destroyed through the corruption they create. This links to the scar on the Island which is manmade thus symbolises the damaging encroachment of humans in paradise. The conch which is founded by Piggy and Ralph and is used to reinforce order and authority, only the person holding the conch may talk and everybody else has to listen. Jack smashes the conch which metaphorical of him breaking away from the civilised society they have established into a world of violence and savagery. Piggy’s glasses symbolise understanding and clarity however when the lenses become cracked (also at the hands of Jack) this marks the boys losing sight of what they need to do and a further breakdown in the civilization. The boy’s only connection with civilisation and hope of ever returning to it is the signal fire which the longer the boys remain on the Island the less important it becomes which demonstrates their loss of moral values and interest in authority. When the fire rages out of control it is metaphorical of the boy’s loss of control or perhaps society’s influence on them. The title which Golding chose â€Å"Lord of the Flies† is significant as it contributes highly to the interpretation of the novel. There is reference to the Hebrew name Beelzebub which means â€Å"God of the flies† this is synonymous with Satan as he was the Devils right hand man. This religious reference Golding uses to illustrate an interesting Freudian concept about the ID which is what governs an individual’s survival and Golding indicates it is the internal psyche of the inherit evil of human nature which leads to the frightening events on the Island and not external supernatural forces. The Beast which is used as a tool of fear on the Island personifies the savagery and evil of mankind that Golding is trying to highlight. Another religious reference which is evident throughout is Simon being seen as a Christ like figure he is the only person who understands the truth of human nature but he is slain as he attempts to share it. This is a criticism of society on Golding’s behalf as if somebody speaks out and blames events on the government they are put in prison or executed. It is therefore questioning if we ever have freedom of speech even in modern society and it is employing everybody to look within themselves because as we are all human we are products of society which makes us corrupted thus this is why we will never have a utopian society as humans are corrupt to the core. This assumption is confirmed by Golding himself â€Å"the boys try to construct a civilization but it breaks down in terror because the boys are sufferering from the terrible disease of being human†. It is therefore clear that Golding’s hypothesis about humanity is pessimistic and I don’t believe in this novel he has attempted to shape a outlook on a future society. With his attitude towards human kind he would not concern himself with trying to shape the future as it would be pointless as the inherit evil of human nature he depicts is unchangeable. Much is the same with Orwell however he does not place so much blame on individuals but is more critical of governments. Thus both authors do not concern themselves with influencing the future of society as both make it clear that they never think an ideal society is achievable.

Robert of Jumieges Essay Example

Robert of Jumieges Essay Another relevant reason as to why the crises of 1051 and 1052 were significant was because it showed the true authority and capabilities the earls had and the weakness and incapabilitys of the King. Edward knew that he would only ever be King in name unless he could destroy Godwins authority. McLynn quotes, If he did not take a stand against Godwin and his contumacious family he would be reduced to the status of figurehead King or cipher. The crises of 1051-52 merely clarified this fact that the King just did not have the power to make any grand scale decisions. Everything was decided either in advance for the King or on the spot for him. He was forced into marrying Godwins daughter Edith for example. Now what possible reason could there be to suggest that Edward actually wanted to wed Edith. Apart from the fact that she was much younger than he was she just happened to be a daughter of the man he hated most who just wanted some Godwin blood on the throne. Another example would be the incident of Eustace of Bologne where he couldnt even force an earl to punish his own men; he was taken to trial. We will write a custom essay sample on Robert of Jumieges specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Robert of Jumieges specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Robert of Jumieges specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer So it was clearly obvious that these events of 1051 and 52 showed just how much authority Edward didnt have in terms of decision making. But it was not only in his decision-making that Edward lacked the power needed but also in terms of his strength on the battlefield. In preparation for his first battle with Godwin Edward tried desperately to get the remaining two earls Leofric and Siward to support him. Leofric was particularly reluctant to help out but in the end the end decided on doing so. This then resulted in Godwin having to accept defeat and being exiled from the country. However when Godwin returned for part two of the battle the earls basically refused bluntly to help Edward in any way shape or form. Without the assistance of the earls Edward was defenceless and weak. He therefore had to accept Godwins terms and let his most hated enemy run his country. It is therefore obvious that the King had no control over his own actions unless he had the support of at least one earl. A significant long-term effect of the crises of 1051-52 was also the beginning of the Godwins dominance on the country. With Godwin now virtually running the nation he could put anyone wherever and whenever he wanted. Harold Godwinson then succeeded Godwin on to the earl of Wessex when he died and also became he head of his large and popular family. As earl Harold could use his assets to help him perform his duties for the king more effectively. Then on the 6th of January 1066 Godwins life long dream was established when his son, a man of pure Godwin blood, was crowned king of England. One son was King another an earl. The Godwin reign had begun. Godwin was a true family man and the events during 1051-52 express this. This theory was particularly apparent when he forced Edward into marrying his daughter in the chance that they would have a son of Godwin blood who would be heir to the throne. Unfortunately for Godwin this did not work out for a number of different reasons. Godwin also showed his dedication to having his family stay as one in England so when he was gone they could be a formidable force, when he desperately pleaded with King Edward for his eldest son Swein to be forgiven and be able to return. Surely committing a sin as hostile as he did any other father would disown him however this was never the case for Godwin. He eventually did get his way and Swein was allowed to return only for him to unexpectedly die on a pilgrimage seeking penance from God. Harold was also Earl of East Anglia for eight years whilst the confrontations between Edward and Godwin had gone on. So for the Godwins they would have felt they gained an extremely vast mount out of the crises of 1051 and 52. Looking back on the Crises of 1051 and 1052 Historians will probably feel that the most significant result was the confusion and controversy over the successor to Edwards throne. There would never have been any confusion or arguments over this only if Edwards wife had given birth to a son. Of course this was not to happen for a number of reasons, possibly he was too religious, or maybe he did not want any grandson of Godwin being heir to the throne. However either way a son of Edward just was not to be. Therefore when Edward did eventually die there was a number of people who lied claim to he throne. A major contender at the time, however the more historians look back on it the more it seems unlikely was William. This claim was apparently true on a number of accounts. There were two main suggestions as to why William could possibly have become Williams successor to the throne. The first, rather unbelievable but at the same time still a suggestion, was that William visited Edward in 1051 and was apparently promised the throne there and then. The second, a little more believable, was that Edward sent Robert of Jumieges to promise the throne and as a sign that this offer was authentic to also give Godwins hostages Wulfnoth (son) and Hakon (Grandson). This supposedly took place in 1051 and was supposedly agreed by both Edward and Stigand (the in between man who was trusted by both Edward and Godwin). This theory therefore has a perfectly legitimate claim. However why would Edward choose William? The Normans came up with three reasons. One They were very distant relations and therefore someone of the same blood. Two It was an almost thank you gesture for helping him out in 1043 when he had fled to Normandy. And finally because Edward apparently felt William was the best man for the job (taking into consideration that he was only fourteen at the time). It was also claimed that Edward was desperate to keep some Norman influence in England. There maybe quite a bit of evidence backing up Williams claim, however the evidence to say it was a false claim is undoubtedly more reliable and realistic. For example there were many others with much better claims to the throne (Earl Ralph, Edward Aething etc. ). Edward also had no great love of Normandy. He was never treated well there nor was he ever welcomed there. McLynn writes A vague promise was made but it was not genuine. On the other hand Barlow writes in his book Edward had already promised the throne to Swein Estrithson. He just used the nomination as a diplomatic card. The more realistic and probably true having known the type of character Robert of Jumieges was is written by Walker and it basically says that the promise was made by Jumieges when escaping after 1052. He had hostages with him and made the offer out of spite for Godwin and because he wanted William to re-instate him. In conclusion I feel that the period in history which was the crises of 1051-52 were a significant time for the Countrys history. The two years contained controversy, countless squabbles, treason, backstabbing and violence. The main consequences of the crises were, a long exhausting and humiliating defeat for Edward, a huge gain for Godwin who laid the foundations for the next generation and a lot of controversy caused mainly by a certain individual known as Robert of Jumieges.